https://images.app.goo.gl/JPqzem8hcVobFYZTA
On Wednesday, the Hollywood writers’ strike will have been in effect for 100 days. Contract negotiations are at a standstill, and people are protesting what they see as a lack of respect for their demands by staying on the picket lines. The Writers Guild of America (WGA) and the major studios were unable to reach an agreement during talks on a number of topics, including compensation, the minimum staffing requirements for writers’ rooms, and residual payments in the age of streaming, among others, which led to the start of the strike on May 2.
The use of artificial intelligence, which writers worry may supplant their creative input, was another something they attempted to regulate. Executives in the entertainment sector have been attempting to balance the competing interests of streaming companies that are mostly struggling to make a profit, dwindling television revenues, and a movie box office that has yet to reach pre-COVID levels. “We are in some uncharted waters,” Warner Bros Discovery’s (WBD.O) Chief Executive David Zaslav cautioned investors last week as the firm warned that the timing of the company’s film slate and its capacity to develop and deliver content could be affected by the labor strife in Hollywood. In a dispute over compensation and artificial intelligence, actors covered by the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) went on strike on July 14. This virtually halted the production of scripted television programs and movies and had an effect on businesses all around the entertainment industry. Since 1960, neither union has walked out on the job until now. The Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP), the organization representing the major studios in negotiations, and the WGA met last week to consider resuming negotiations. However, no specific timetable for returning to the negotiating table was set.
Later that day, in a message to its 11,500 members, the WGA expressed displeasure about information being revealed from the private meeting, but stated that the guild’s negotiating committee “remains willing to engage with the companies and resume negotiations in good faith.” Requests for comment on this article from the AMPTP and the WGA were both rejected. This week, resolve and wrath coexisted on the picket lines. Dawn Prestwich, whose credits include the TV drama “Chicago Hope,” stated, “We are in it until we get the deal we need and deserve, but we can’t help but be discouraged by the attitude that we’re getting from the AMPTP.” “The indifference is kind of outright cruelty in some ways,” the speaker said.
As they have in the past, according to Prestwich, studio executives and writers are meant to collaborate creatively. She declared, “This business is shifting right now. Now, it doesn’t seem like a human enterprise. Writers have occasionally used the three-month strike to wage class warfare by criticizing the pay of media CEOs. After recently securing a contract extension that allowed him to earn an annual incentive bonus worth five times his base pay, Walt Disney Chief Executive Bob Iger came under fire for saying the union demands were “just not realistic.”
Jamey Perry, a TV writer and WGA member, stated, “What makes me unhappy isn’t believing we’re not going to win. “What saddens me is seeing the cruelty and avarice of these businesses and the utter wrongness of what they are doing,’ she said. It is very uncomfortable. This job action, like previous writers’ strikes, is in response to Hollywood leveraging a new method of distribution and writers hoping to share in the newfound revenue. Writers and actors demanded residual payments for airing classic films on television during the first strike, which took place in 1960. A decade later, in 1985, writers went on strike to demand a cut of the expanding home video market’s profits. The 100-day strike in 2007–2008 included a focus on expanding guild rights to “new media,” which included content supplied via ad-supported internet services, movie and TV downloads, and other content. This time, the desire for restrictions on the development of artificial intelligence technology has gained prominence, but residual payments for streaming services remain a major concern. Disney has established a task group to research artificial intelligence and how it may be used throughout the entertainment conglomerate, emphasizing the significance of the technology, according to Reuters. “Workers desire a cut of new revenue streams that technologies create. Professor of history at the University of Southern California Steven J. Ross said: “Plain and simple. “The situation around artificial intelligence is one of existential crisis. They may be at danger of losing their jobs forever.
