Veteran writer Frederic Raphael criticises Tom Cruise and labels him as an “Egocentric control freak”

Tom Cruise was criticised by Frederic Raphael, who also questioned the chemistry between him and his ex-wife Nicole Kidman.

Hollywood star Tom Cruise has been branded an “egocentric control freak” by ‘Eyes Wide Shut’ writer Frederic Raphael. The veteran writer – who has been open about the issues he had working with the 1999 film’s late director Stanley Kubrick – blasted the ‘Mission: Impossible’ actor and questioned the chemistry between him and his then-wife Nicole Kidman in the movie, even though they have never met, reports ‘Female First UK’.

The 91-year-old author made the comments in a letter he wrote for his latest book, “Last Post,” in which he accused Tom, the director’s wife Christiane Harlan, and her brother Jan of trying to obliterate him from the director’s “history” and being responsible for his unfavourable Wikipedia entry.

During the two or three years that he addressed himself solely to you, he allegedly wrote: “There has been an ongoing push, driven by the Harlans, to deny that I had much to do with the finished version of ‘Eyes Wide Shut,’ which I never met. My Wikipedia entry has been corrupted by the Harlans and Master Cruise, who inserted some offensive material.

He further mentioned, quoted by ‘Female First UK’, “There must be some way of excising the libel, but I lack the modern skill or the dreary energy to pursue the matter. Their sullen purpose is to establish your grand-masterliness. I have never been called a liar by anyone as I have been by the Harlan clan and by Tom Cruise, an egocentric control freak to whom I have never spoken. He did offer me a job though, soon after you finished shooting; the better to have me on a leash, no doubt. In his turn, he too seems to need the control he finds in Scientology.”

Advertisement

“‘Since Eyes Wide Shut’, he has spent a lot of time running for his living, winning fixed fights or hurtling into space. Nothing like a helmet for heading off dialogue”, he added. Frederic then questioned Kubrick’s judgement and motive behind his casting for the film.

He wrote: “It was never admiration for his versatility, was it? From all accounts, you gave him slow hell for Warner Brothers’ money. You slave-drove him for what he cost and he took it like a man. What do you suppose he ever told the Scientology brass that locked him in hock to them? Was there something just a touch naïve in your idea that casting a married couple as a married couple would enable you to put ‘the truth’ on the screen? One thing you can be pretty sure of: whatever any conjugal duo may disclose in public about their relationship, they rarely let any crucial cat out of the bag.”