
Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s recent address to the court has given rise to controversy, as he leveled serious allegations of a liquor scam involving Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Kejriwal claimed that Sarath Reddy, son of Aurobindo Pharma founder PV Ram Prasad Reddy, was made to pay a massive sum of ₹55 crore as protection money to the BJP, implying a deep-rooted connection between big corporations and political entities.
Kejriwal’s statements shed light on what he perceives as discrepancies in the ED’s handling of the case. He criticized the agency for allegedly suppressing statements and creating a diversionary tactic against his political party, the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP). Furthermore, he questioned the authenticity of the evidence presented by the ED, particularly emphasizing the absence of any concrete proof regarding the alleged ₹100 crore payment by a “South Lobby” to AAP.
Despite being under arrest since March 2024, Kejriwal highlighted that he hasn’t undergone trial or faced conviction by any court. He challenged the legitimacy of his arrest, particularly questioning the reliance on statements from only four approvers, including C. Arvind, who is the PA of Manish Sisodia, a senior member of the AAP.
The ED countered Kejriwal arguing that he should not address the court while being represented by legal counsel. The agency insisted that Kejriwal cannot simultaneously avail himself of legal representation and address the court directly. Additionally, the ED claimed to possess evidence linking illegal funds from the liquor scam to AAP’s campaign ahead of the Goa elections.
Kejriwal’s appearance in court follows his arrest in connection with a money laundering case related to Delhi’s excise policy. The case revolves around alleged corruption and money laundering in formulating and executing the policy. Despite the ongoing legal battle, Kejriwal’s assertions have sparked debate and raised questions about the political parties, bias and corruption.
As the legal proceedings unfold, the public eagerly awaits further developments in this high-profile case, which has implications not only for the individuals involved but also for the broader political landscape of the country.
The article has been modified using artificial intelligence (AI) tools.