Vice President Kamala Harris delivered a powerful message at a recent African church conference, where she declared, “We are not going back,” in response to the church leaders’ decision to vote in favour of banning gay marriage. Harris’s remarks were met with both applause and controversy, reflecting the deep divisions over LGBTQ+ rights within religious communities and beyond.
The conference, attended by influential church leaders from across Africa, had recently voted to uphold traditional definitions of marriage, explicitly banning same-sex unions. This decision, rooted in conservative religious beliefs, has been criticized by LGBTQ+ advocates and allies, who view it as a step backwards in the fight for equality and human rights.
Harris did not shy away from the contentious issue in her address, reaffirming her commitment to advancing LGBTQ+ rights in the United States and globally. “We are not going back,” Harris asserted, emphasizing that the fight for equality is far from over and that progress must continue despite resistance. Her words were a clear message that the U.S. government, under the Biden administration, remains committed to promoting and protecting the rights of LGBTQ+ individuals worldwide.
Harris’s statement comes at a time when debates over LGBTQ+ rights are intensifying in many parts of the world, including Africa, where cultural and religious views often clash with the push for more inclusive laws and policies. By addressing the conference, Harris positioned herself as a strong advocate for human rights, challenging those who seek to roll back protections for marginalized communities.
The Vice President’s remarks have garnered significant attention, with supporters praising her for standing up for equality and justice in a challenging environment. They argue that her stance reinforces the importance of international leadership on human rights issues and sends a clear signal that discrimination based on sexual orientation will not be tolerated.
However, Harris’s comments have also sparked criticism from those who believe that her intervention in the matter disrespects the religious beliefs and autonomy of the church leaders. Critics argue that decisions regarding marriage should be left to individual religious institutions and that outside political pressure undermines the integrity of their faith traditions.
The tension between religious beliefs and LGBTQ+ rights is a complex and ongoing global issue. Harris’s bold declaration at the African church conference highlights the challenges of navigating these deeply rooted conflicts while striving to uphold the principles of equality and human dignity.