Manchester United’s dramatic 4-4 draw against Bournemouth at Old Trafford has sparked intense debate over Ruben Amorim’s latest tactical experiment. In a game filled with relentless momentum shifts and attacking flair, United unveiled a new 4-3-3 system, moving away from the manager’s preferred 3-4-3 setup. While the contest delivered pure entertainment, it also raised serious questions about whether the tactical shift truly benefits the team.
From an attacking standpoint, the new formation showed promise. United looked fluid in transition, with greater freedom for wide forwards and more bodies arriving in central areas. The midfield trio provided quicker ball circulation, allowing United to sustain pressure and respond rapidly each time Bournemouth took the lead. Scoring four goals reflected the attacking potential Amorim is keen to unlock.
However, the defensive shortcomings were equally evident. United’s back line struggled with spacing and coordination, particularly during quick Bournemouth counters. The absence of an extra centre-back left the defence exposed, and lapses in concentration proved costly as United repeatedly surrendered their advantage. Conceding four goals at home highlighted a lack of structural stability, something the 3-4-3 had previously helped address.
