In the aftermath of a widely discussed live session featuring Appurva, Ruru, and Rushali, Sorab Bedi addressed the situation through his own Instagram live broadcast. During this session, he stated that he had formally filed a domestic violence case against his former partner, Appurva. He alleged that he had experienced physical harm during their relationship and clarified that this legal action was taken in response to those experiences. He also noted that he had informed Appurva about a meeting with Akansha on January 23, presenting this as part of his effort to clarify timelines and communication during their relationship.
The development follows claims made during the earlier live interaction, where Appurva had shared her account of their past relationship, including allegations of infidelity during Sorab Bedi’s participation in Splitsvilla. She had stated that she believed certain on-screen relationships were not genuine even after the show ended. Additionally, Ruru Thakur had contributed her perspective, alleging that she had been threatened regarding disclosure of past information. These statements were made publicly during the live broadcast and have since circulated across digital platforms, prompting multiple responses.
Defamation Case Filed Against Ruru Thakur Amid Escalating Dispute
In the same Instagram live session, Sorab Bedi stated that he had also initiated a defamation case against Ruru Thakur. He indicated that the decision was based on statements made during the earlier live interaction, which he described as damaging to his reputation. According to his account, the legal step was intended to formally address claims he considers inaccurate. This marks a significant escalation in the dispute, transitioning from public exchanges on social media to formal legal proceedings.
All statements referenced stem from the respective individuals’ live sessions and public disclosures on Instagram, which serve as the primary source of information. No independent verification of the claims has been presented within these broadcasts. The situation continues to develop as audiences follow updates from the involved parties, with attention now shifting toward how these legal actions may unfold.