Amber Rose, once a vocal pro-choice feminist and critic of Donald Trump, has caused a stir by publicly supporting Trump at the Republican National Convention 2024. This dramatic shift from her previous stance has left many questioning what prompted her about-face.
Previously, Amber Rose had openly criticized Trump, calling him “an idiot” during the 2016 Presidential Election. Her new endorsement of Trump as “the best chance at a better life for Americans” has been met with confusion and mixed reactions. Rose herself explained her shift in allegiance by stating that she overcame her fear of judgment and criticism from the left, embracing a new political identity.
Amber Rose is known for her feminist activism through her SlutWalk movement, which stands against victim-blaming and slut-shaming while empowering individuals to embrace their sexuality. This movement advocates for women’s rights and challenges sexism and body-shaming. Given that many of Trump’s policies and the Republican platform oppose these principles—such as his attempts to influence women’s reproductive choices—her support for Trump seems contradictory.
Speculation is rife about the true motivation behind her political shift. One theory suggests that Rose’s support for Trump could be connected to her involvement in a controversial crypto project. Alex Cole, a software engineer, has pointed out that Amber Rose is under investigation for a failed crypto scam. On June 26, Rose had teased her followers with a post about her new cryptocurrency, MUVA, which was later criticized as a potential scam.
If the rumors about the investigation are true, Rose’s support for Trump and the Republicans might be strategic. Given Trump’s history of granting pardons to associates, aligning herself with him could be a move to secure a pardon if she faces legal trouble related to the crypto scam.
In summary, Amber Rose’s shift in political stance has raised eyebrows and fueled speculation about her motives. Whether it’s a genuine change of heart or a strategic move to avoid legal consequences, her new position has sparked debate and curiosity among her followers and the public.
