Chinese President Xi Jinping declared that the world order is crumbling into disarray — a statement that arrives as Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov sits across the table from Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Beijing for two days of talks, as the US-Iran ceasefire has effectively collapsed, as Brent crude trades above $102 per barrel, as the IEA confirms Hormuz flows have fallen from 20 million to 3.8 million barrels per day, and as Iran’s Pezeshkian tells Macron that American maximalism blocked the Islamabad agreement.
Xi’s framing is both a diagnosis and a positioning statement. By characterising the current global situation as a crumbling of the world order into disarray, China’s president is doing several things simultaneously.
He is describing what is observable. The rules-based international order that the United States constructed and led since 1945 is under simultaneous stress from multiple directions — a US-Iran war in the Middle East that has closed the world’s most critical energy waterway, an ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, a US-China trade confrontation featuring tariffs and technology restrictions, and the fracturing of multilateral institutions from the United Nations Security Council to the WTO. The IEA’s confirmation that Hormuz flows have collapsed 81% is one empirical measure of what world order disarray looks like in energy market terms.
He is legitimising an alternative order. China has positioned itself throughout the current crisis as the responsible global stakeholder that the United States is not — maintaining trade relationships with Iran, continuing to purchase Iranian crude regardless of US sanctions, hosting Lavrov for strategic consultations, and offering diplomatic channels to parties on multiple sides of the conflict. A world order crumbling into disarray is one in which China’s alternative model of bilateral relationships, non-interference, and multipolar governance becomes more attractive to the non-Western world.
He is speaking directly to Lavrov. The timing of Xi’s statement — delivered as Russia’s top diplomat is in Beijing — is not incidental. Moscow and Beijing have been building what both describe as a partnership without limits since February 2022, and the current crisis has deepened every dimension of that relationship. Russia has been a major alternative oil supplier to Asian markets during the Hormuz disruption. China has been Iran’s primary crude buyer throughout the war. Both countries have deep interests in a post-war Middle Eastern order that does not entrench American military dominance over the Strait of Hormuz. Xi’s world order statement is the ideological framework within which the Lavrov-Wang Yi conversations are taking place.
He is speaking to the Global South. The countries watching the current crisis most anxiously — India, the ASEAN members, the African and Latin American nations that import oil through Gulf supply chains, the developing economies whose growth projections are being cut by every week the Hormuz disruption continues — are the audience for Xi’s framing. A world order crumbling into disarray is an invitation to those countries to reconsider their alignment with an American-led system that is generating the instability they are currently absorbing.
The statement also intersects with the specific demands China has made throughout the crisis. ASEAN foreign ministers called for freedom of navigation under UNCLOS. China has been the primary beneficiary of IRGC passage arrangements for friendly-nation vessels. Xi’s world order framing gives diplomatic cover to Beijing’s selective engagement with Iranian-controlled Hormuz passage — not as acquiescence to a violation of international law, but as a pragmatic response to a collapsing order that the United States itself has destabilised.
For global markets, Xi’s statement is the most senior articulation yet of the geopolitical context in which Brent above $102, Hormuz at 3.8 million barrels per day, and Thursday’s potential US-Iran talks are all occurring. The world order the IEA assumes when it models energy supply chains, the world order the World Bank assumed when it forecast 0.2 to 0.3 percentage point global growth losses from a held ceasefire, and the world order India assumed when it built its energy security architecture around reliable Gulf supply chains — that order, China’s president is now saying publicly, is crumbling into disarray.
Whether Thursday’s US-Iran talks can begin to reverse that assessment is the most consequential open question in global affairs as of Tuesday, April 14, 2026.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Readers are advised to exercise independent judgement when assessing geopolitical developments and their market implications. Business Upturn is not responsible for any decisions made based on this article.