Iran’s Ambassador to India said on Monday that Tehran maintains good contact with the Indian government on safe passage for Indian ships and that Iran wants to help India. On a day when Brent crude crossed $102, the US proposed a naval blockade of Tehran-linked ships, and Iran threatened to attack Gulf ports, that statement was the closest thing to good news India received. But is the Strait of Hormuz actually open for India? The answer is yes, no, and it depends — all at the same time.
The yes
India has been among the most successful countries in securing individual passage arrangements with Iran since the conflict began on February 28. Two LPG carriers operated by the Shipping Corporation of India were among the earliest non-Iranian vessels permitted to transit the strait after the effective closure began. India is on Iran’s list of friendly nations — a status that reflects India’s longstanding refusal to join Western sanctions against Iran, its continued purchase of Iranian crude before 2019 sanctions forced a pause, and its consistent diplomatic positioning as a non-aligned country that does not take sides in US-Iran confrontations.
The ambassador’s Monday statement — good contact with the Indian government, Iran wants to help India — is the diplomatic confirmation of that friendly nation status. It means Indian-flagged and Indian-chartered vessels have a channel through which to negotiate IRGC clearance for Hormuz transit that vessels from US-allied countries simply do not have access to.
The no
Having a channel and having reliable, unimpeded passage are two very different things. The IRGC’s permission-based system for Hormuz transit means every crossing requires prior coordination and approval. Passage is selective, can be revoked at any time, and is subject to the IRGC’s assessment of the broader political situation on any given day. When Israel struck Lebanon with phosphorus shells on Monday and Iran halted tanker traffic in response to Lebanese strikes earlier in the conflict, even friendly-nation vessels found themselves waiting rather than moving. The friendly nation status is a diplomatic asset. It is not a guarantee.
The volumes tell the story clearly. Before the war, 138 ships crossed the Strait of Hormuz daily. Even with Iran’s friendly nation arrangements operating, total daily crossings fell to single digits at their lowest and had recovered only to four to twenty vessels per day at various points since the ceasefire. India’s ability to move individual vessels through does not mean India’s energy supply chain is functioning normally. It means India can move some oil, some of the time, through a channel that requires active diplomatic maintenance and can close without notice.
The complicated part
India imports over 85% of its crude oil requirements from the Gulf. Even with IRGC passage arrangements in place for Indian vessels, the broader Hormuz disruption has severely constrained the volume of crude India can actually procure and move. The friendly nation status helps at the margins — it is the difference between some supply and no supply — but it does not restore the pre-war supply chain. India was drawing down strategic reserves, its Oil Minister was in Qatar securing alternative supply, and MCX crude was already elevated at Rs 9,058 per barrel before Monday’s $102 Brent spike, all of which reflects an energy procurement environment that is far from normal regardless of what the Iran ambassador says.
The escalation surrounding Monday’s statement also introduces new uncertainty. Iran has declared a permanent Hormuz control mechanism. The US has proposed a naval blockade of Tehran-linked ships. Netanyahu has confirmed uranium enrichment as a non-negotiable American demand. In a US naval blockade scenario, the question of whether the strait is open for India becomes moot — American naval interdiction of Iranian-linked vessels would create a military standoff in the strait that no bilateral India-Iran diplomatic channel could navigate around.
What India is doing about it
India is not relying solely on the Iran channel. The government has been running a parallel track of alternative supply arrangements — Saudi Yanbu port shipments, UAE Fujairah terminal procurement, diversification toward Russian crude through the Sakhalin route, and the Oil Minister’s Qatar visit for LNG supply continuity. The Iran ambassador’s statement is one input into a multi-track energy security response, not the whole answer.
The one-line answer
The Strait of Hormuz is open for India in the sense that Iran has told New Delhi it wants to help and maintain passage for Indian ships. It is not open for India in the sense that normal, reliable, full-volume energy supply through the world’s most important energy waterway has been restored. The difference between those two statements is the difference between diplomatic goodwill and energy security — and right now India has the former but not the latter.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Energy market data is indicative and subject to change. Readers are advised to consult a SEBI-registered financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Business Upturn is not responsible for any decisions made based on this article.