Prince Yadav struck early as Finn Allen fell for another low score, caught at third man in a moment that drew debate over whether it should have been a six.
Early breakthrough for Prince Yadav
Allen tried to attack after a couple of early boundaries but lost shape against a short-of-length delivery from Yadav. The ball rose and took the top edge as he went across the line, sending it high towards third man.
Digvesh Rathi moved well along the boundary and completed the catch, but the moment was tight. The ball went very close to the rope, and there was visible movement of the skirting, which raised questions over whether it had touched the boundary.
Six debate lingers despite dismissal
The decision was given in favour of the fielding side, with Allen walking back after another low score. The third umpire review did not overturn the on-field call, but the replay left room for doubt among viewers and commentators.
Some argued that the contact with the rope should have made it a six. Others felt Rathi kept control and remained within the field of play. In the end, the wicket stood, and Allen’s struggles with the bat continued. Adding to the discussion, former India cricketer Mohammad Kaif, part of the broadcasters’ panel, also raised concerns over the third umpire’s decision. The incident has triggered further scrutiny over how such tight boundary calls are judged, with calls for clearer and more consistent use of technology.
Six or Out?- https://x.com/StarSportsIndia/status/2042252166765936848