UP Assembly passes stricter Anti-Conversion bill with life sentence as maximum penalty

The Uttar Pradesh Assembly has enacted a tougher anti-conversion law, introducing life imprisonment as the maximum penalty for illegal conversions.

The Uttar Pradesh Assembly has passed a bill that significantly strengthens the state’s anti-conversion laws. The newly revised Anti-Conversion Bill introduces life imprisonment as the maximum penalty for those convicted of unlawful religious conversions, marking a substantial shift in the state’s approach to managing conversion practices.

The bill, which garnered overwhelming support in the Assembly, aims to curb what the government terms as “forced” or “unlawful” conversions by increasing legal repercussions. Under the new legislation, individuals found guilty of engaging in or facilitating such conversions could face a life sentence, along with substantial fines.

During the debate, proponents of the bill argued that the stringent measures are necessary to protect individuals from coercion and ensure that conversions occur freely and voluntarily. They emphasized that the bill seeks to address concerns about the misuse of religious conversion practices and safeguard the rights of individuals to make informed and voluntary decisions regarding their faith.

Opponents of the bill have expressed concerns about potential misuse and the impact on religious freedom. Critics argue that the new penalties might lead to unintended consequences, including harassment and the infringement of personal liberties.

The Uttar Pradesh government, led by Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, has defended the bill as a crucial step towards maintaining law and order in the state. The administration has stressed that the legislation is designed to uphold ethical practices in religious conversion and prevent exploitation.

The bill’s passage reflects the state’s broader legislative agenda aimed at reinforcing its stance on various social and legal issues. This new law is expected to provoke discussions and legal challenges regarding its implementation and impact on religious practices.