Delhi High Court extends Naresh Goyal’s interim bail in ED case by 2 months

The ED has been investigating Goyal for allegedly diverting company funds for personal use, which has added to the scrutiny surrounding the troubled airline.

Naresh Goyal, the founder of Jet Airway has been granted a two-month extension to his interim bail by the Delhi High Court in a case led by the Enforcement Directorate (ED). This decision comes as Goyal faces allegations related to financial irregularities and money laundering linked to the airline’s operations.

The court’s extension of bail, which was originally granted in June, allows Goyal to remain free while the legal process continues. This move provides him additional time to prepare his defence against the charges, which include accusations of financial misconduct and siphoning of funds. The ED has been investigating Goyal for allegedly diverting company funds for personal use, which has added to the scrutiny surrounding the troubled airline.

Goyal’s legal team has argued that the extension is necessary due to the complexity of the case and the need for more time to gather evidence and prepare for court proceedings. They have also emphasized Goyal’s cooperation with the investigation and his commitment to complying with legal obligations.

The ED, meanwhile, has maintained its position that there is substantial evidence linking Goyal to the alleged financial irregularities and has called for a thorough investigation. The case has been closely watched, given Jet Airways’ significant role in India’s aviation sector and the impact of its downfall on employees and stakeholders.

Goyal, who founded Jet Airways in 1992, stepped down as chairman in 2019 as the airline faced severe financial difficulties, eventually leading to its suspension of operations. The ongoing investigation and legal proceedings are pivotal in determining the extent of accountability for the airline’s collapse.

As the legal process unfolds, the extension of Goyal’s interim bail provides a temporary reprieve but does not resolve the underlying issues facing both him and the broader airline industry. The next hearings will likely address further motions and evidence as the case progresses.