Image Credit- Afp via Dawn
Pakistan has once again stirred controversy at the Conference of Disarmament (CD) in Geneva by obstructing the adoption of the ‘2024 Program of Work’ proposed by India, despite the absence of any mention of the Fissile-Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT) in the proposal. The CD operates on the principle of consensus, and Pakistan’s opposition effectively halted the program’s progression.
Pakistan’s reluctance to sign the FMCT, citing concerns about its military stance vis-à-vis India, has been a recurring point of contention. This move by Islamabad drew sharp criticism, with veteran disarmament diplomats denouncing it as “bloody-mindedness” without substantive justification.
During India’s one-month presidency from January 21 to February 20, efforts were made to craft a document through consultations to ensure the program’s success. However, Pakistan’s consistent obstructionism thwarted these efforts. Notably, the last Program of Work adopted by the CD was in 2022.
At the recent Plenary meeting, Pakistan’s opposition to the proposed Program of Work once again became evident, further stalling progress on disarmament and arms control initiatives, a pattern it has maintained over the years. Despite support from major powers like the U.S., France, Russia, UK, and even China, Pakistan’s refusal to endorse the proposal raised questions among delegations present.
In a statement, Pakistan’s representative emphasized the country’s objection to being singled out as the sole dissenting member state. The representative highlighted concerns about the CD’s fixation on the FMCT and the Shannon Mandate, which Pakistan views as limiting the forum’s scope.
India, on the other hand, acknowledged the compromise made to accommodate Pakistan’s concerns within the proposed Program of Work. The Indian envoy stressed the need for inclusivity and compromise to move forward with substantive work in a balanced manner.
China, Pakistan’s steadfast ally, refrained from criticising Islamabad’s stance, instead advocating for consensus-based decision-making that respects the red lines of all delegations, including Pakistan.
The deadlock at the CD underscores the challenges in achieving consensus on crucial disarmament issues and the need for diplomatic efforts to bridge divergent perspectives and interests. Despite setbacks, the pursuit of meaningful dialogue and cooperation remains imperative in addressing global security challenges.
