Advertisement
Forbes’ annual “30 Under 30” list is a renowned compilation that celebrates and recognizes young individuals for their outstanding achievements and contributions in various fields. The selection process involves a panel of expert judges who assess candidates based on a range of factors, such as funding, revenue, social impact, scale, inventiveness, and potential.
The inclusion of Noah Schnapp, known for his role in Netflix’s popular series “Stranger Things,” has sparked significant controversy and negative reception among some observers. Critics have highlighted that unlike many other actors on the list, Schnapp reportedly doesn’t have other projects lined up apart from the upcoming season of “Stranger Things.”
However, the primary reason for the backlash against Schnapp’s inclusion stems from a recent controversy he was involved in, related to his comments on the Israel-Gaza conflict. This controversy ignited a strong reaction on social media, with some users demanding his removal from the next season of “Stranger Things.”
Schnapp’s outspoken pro-Israel stance, along with a viral TikTok video depicting him and friends distributing “Zionism is sexy” stickers at a café, intensified the negative response. Despite Schnapp’s silence on social media since October 11, 2023, his comments, along with other related events like Melissa Barrera’s departure from “Scream 7” and Susan Sarandon’s agency dropping her for criticizing Israel, have kept the controversy fresh in people’s minds.
The recent addition of Schnapp to the Forbes “30 Under 30” list reignited the ongoing debate regarding the consequences individuals face for expressing polarizing opinions. Critics question why Schnapp appears to face fewer consequences for his polarizing views compared to others who have encountered professional repercussions for expressing similar sentiments.
The situation has sparked a heated conversation about freedom of expression, accountability, and the differential treatment individuals receive based on their opinions, reigniting discussions that never truly cooled down since the initial controversy.