image credits - cnn
Advertisement
As Israel continues its war with Hamas and faces threats from other terror groups, the upcoming U.S. presidential election is drawing attention from many Israelis. The choice between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris has sparked debate, as both candidates’ foreign policy approaches could have significant implications for Israel’s security.
Trump, who enjoyed strong support in Israel during his presidency, is remembered for several bold moves that resonated with many Israelis, including the relocation of the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem and the recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights. His administration’s brokering of the Abraham Accords, which normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations, is also seen as a historic achievement that strengthened regional alliances.
Supporters of Trump in Israel argue that his assertive stance against Iran and terrorist organizations like Hamas demonstrated unwavering support for Israeli security. “Trump was a leader who understood the threat of terror and took steps to ensure our safety,” said one Israeli resident, reflecting the views of many who believe Trump’s policies directly benefited Israel.
On the other hand, Kamala Harris represents continuity with the Biden administration, which has taken a more balanced approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. While Harris is perceived as supportive of Israel’s right to defend itself, her administration may prioritize diplomacy and efforts to restart peace talks, which some Israelis view as less effective given the ongoing violence with Hamas.
Critics of Harris argue that the current U.S. administration’s engagement with Iran and a perceived softening on terror groups could embolden Israel’s enemies. However, others feel that Harris’s focus on human rights and multilateral diplomacy might foster long-term stability. “Harris has a more pragmatic view that could help address the root causes of the conflict,” said an Israeli political analyst, expressing hope for a more nuanced approach to regional security.