Advertisement
It seems that in the realm of politics, showcasing acts of animal cruelty has become a bizarre qualification for the second-highest office in the nation. Forget about policy debates and leadership acumen; according to South Dakota’s leader, Kristi Noem, the key to winning over voters lies in boasting about shooting innocent puppies.
In her upcoming book “No Going Back, Noem” provides disturbing details of how she callously ended the life of her hunting dog, Cricket, for merely displaying typical puppy behavior—excitement over chasing birds. Yes, you read that correctly—Noem deemed a puppy “less than worthless” and sentenced her to death. Apparently, Cricket’s natural exuberance was too much for Noem to handle, leading her to label the young dog as “aggressive,” “untrainable,” and “dangerous.”
Her solution? To gruesomely end Cricket’s life in front of a bewildered construction crew at a gravel pit.
While some may express humane concerns, such as Cricket’s young age or the possibility of seeking alternative solutions, Noem dismisses such sentiments as mere Democratic rhetoric. According to her, true leadership means making tough, messy, and ugly decisions—like killing a defenseless puppy. It’s a twisted notion of being tough on crime, one that Noem shamelessly defends, even pitching it as a qualification for the vice presidency on Twitter.
Noem’s tone-deafness is staggering. Not content with justifying her actions, she shamelessly promotes her book in the same breath, capitalizing on the controversy to boost sales.
But this isn’t merely about farming or hunting; it’s about pandering to a base that glorifies violence. It’s about projecting toughness and decisiveness, even at the expense of innocent lives. And it’s about appealing to a demographic that finds such sociopathic behavior admirable.
Predictably, Twitter erupted with criticism, with even some MAGA supporters expressing dismay. One user questioned the sanity of Noem’s actions, while others shared personal stories of challenging pets, highlighting the absurdity of resorting to violence.
Indeed, Noem’s actions betray a disturbing hypocrisy within the Republican party. While they claim to champion life and family values, their actions speak otherwise. It’s a party that embraced Donald Trump, a man whose values are antithetical to their supposed principles.
In the end, Noem’s callous disregard for animal life may prove to be her political undoing. If she believes that boasting about killing defenseless creatures is a path to political success, she may find herself sorely mistaken. Many would argue that her political career should end before it even truly begins.