Advertisement
Anime has always been a uniquely Japanese art form—rooted in local aesthetics, storytelling traditions, and cultural values. From the quiet reflections of Studio Ghibli’s rural tales to the kinetic battles of Naruto and Dragon Ball, anime carried with it a certain unmistakable essence. But as the medium exploded onto global platforms like Netflix, Crunchyroll, Disney+, and Amazon Prime, its DNA began to stretch beyond the borders of Japan.
The 2000s brought anime into mainstream Western consciousness, and by the 2020s, it had become a cultural phenomenon influencing fashion, music, and even Hollywood. Now in 2025, anime isn’t just a Japanese export—it’s a global industry with billion-dollar stakes, multi-national productions, and creative input from around the world.
This evolution is exciting for many, but it also raises a pressing question: is anime still Japanese at its core, or is it being reshaped into a global product that risks losing its identity?
Global Platforms, Japanese Roots: Where It All Began
Anime as a distinct medium grew out of Japanese traditions in manga, kabuki, and ukiyo-e, fused with Western influences from Disney and early cinema. Series like Astro Boy (Tetsuwan Atom) and Mobile Suit Gundam set the tone for anime’s development—heavy on social commentary, character-driven narratives, and stylized visual storytelling.
Despite anime’s Japanese origin, it didn’t take long to gain global fans. In the 1990s and 2000s, Western audiences embraced titles like Sailor Moon, Pokémon, Yu-Gi-Oh!, and Fullmetal Alchemist. At the time, these were dubbed and heavily localized, often stripped of cultural nuance. Yet they still retained their essential “Japaneseness,” from character values to setting and spiritual themes.
Fast forward to 2025, and most anime arrives almost simultaneously worldwide—with subtitles or dubs available in multiple languages. Global streaming platforms are not just distributors—they’re producers. Netflix co-financed Devilman Crybaby and B: The Beginning, Crunchyroll has produced anime like Tower of God and FreakAngels, and Disney+ is jumping in with original titles like Twilight Out of Focus.
As international money flows into the industry, the definition of anime is being pushed—and with it, debates about cultural authenticity.
Who Gets to Make Anime Now?
Traditionally, anime was made by Japanese studios, for Japanese audiences. Now, anime-like content is emerging from countries like South Korea (Lookism, Noblesse), China (Fog Hill of Five Elements, Link Click), and even the U.S. (Castlevania, Avatar: The Last Airbender—although technically not anime, they often get grouped with it).
Even in Japan, studios are outsourcing more animation work to international teams. Shows like One Punch Man and Jujutsu Kaisen involve animators and VFX artists from South Korea, the Philippines, Vietnam, and the U.S. International co-productions have become the norm rather than the exception.
This has expanded anime’s visual vocabulary, introduced new storytelling structures, and increased diversity in character representation. However, it also raises the question: if the art is produced internationally, with input from global creatives, can it still be called “Japanese anime”?
For purists, the answer is no—true anime must come from Japanese studios, creators, and ideologies. For others, anime is a style, not a passport. It’s a shared creative language that can evolve across borders, just as jazz, hip-hop, or film noir did.
Shifting Storytelling: Are Themes Still Japanese?
One of anime’s core strengths has always been its ability to explore themes that resonate deeply with Japanese cultural and philosophical thought—transience (mono no aware), duty vs. desire (giri-ninjō), social conformity, spiritual dualism, and the burden of legacy.
Shows like March Comes in Like a Lion, Erased, A Silent Voice, and Clannad deal with deeply Japanese emotional landscapes. Even in battle-heavy shounen like Naruto or Bleach, themes of loyalty, honor, and generational responsibility reflect core Japanese values.
Yet as anime goes global, new themes emerge: Western individualism, multicultural identity, and global politics. Netflix’s Yasuke, for example, reframes a Japanese legend through the lens of Black history. Cyberpunk: Edgerunners, though animated by Studio Trigger, feels deeply Western in tone and design. And Trese, produced in the Philippines with anime-style visuals, adapts Southeast Asian mythology.
This shift in narrative perspective can lead to richer, more inclusive storytelling. But it can also dilute the cultural specificity that gave anime its depth and uniqueness.
Fan Culture: Expanding the Definition of Anime
Today’s anime fans aren’t just watching Japanese anime—they’re also creating fan art, cosplay, memes, AMVs, and fanfiction. They influence what gets popular through social media trends, YouTube breakdowns, and voting in anime awards.
This global fan culture reshapes what “anime” means. For many, it’s no longer about origin but aesthetic: sharp-lined art styles, expressive character emotions, dynamic fight scenes, and serialized storytelling. If something looks and feels like anime, it is anime.
As a result, shows like RWBY or Arcane, produced outside Japan but heavily influenced by anime, are embraced by fans and often discussed alongside Attack on Titan or Jujutsu Kaisen. This widening of the anime definition makes the medium more inclusive—but also blurs lines of identity.
Some fans argue that without its Japanese soul, anime becomes just another style, losing its distinctiveness in a sea of global animation. Others see this evolution as natural and even necessary—anime as a movement, not just a national product.
Cultural Ownership vs Cultural Sharing
There’s a delicate tension between cultural ownership and cultural sharing. On one hand, anime is a proud expression of Japanese art, deserving of protection and respect. On the other, its popularity was built by global fandoms who feel emotionally invested in its growth.
With the rise of AI animation, international studios, and fan-led trends, Japan no longer has sole control over what anime is or becomes. While some in the industry embrace this, others fear a future where global capitalism strips anime of its soul, turning it into formulaic content aimed solely at international markets.
The challenge lies in collaboration without erasure. Can anime grow globally while staying rooted in Japanese tradition? Can international creators honor anime’s origins while innovating new styles and narratives?
Conclusion: The Soul of Anime in 2025
Anime in 2025 is undoubtedly more global than ever. Its reach is planetary, its production international, and its fanbase multilingual and multicultural. But despite this transformation, the heart of anime remains—its emotional core, visual poetry, and deep storytelling still speak a language that originated in Japan.
While the medium may evolve and expand, its roots are hard to sever. In truth, anime today is both Japanese and global. It carries the fingerprints of Tokyo animators and LA producers, Kyoto storytellers and Seoul VFX artists. That mix doesn’t dilute anime—it enriches it.
So, is anime still Japanese at heart? Yes—but it also belongs to the world now. And that may be exactly why it continues to matter so much.