The Department of Justice recently released a massive batch of documents tied to Jeffrey Epstein. These files are some of the most disturbing yet since the Epstein Files Transparency Act was signed into law in November. Roughly 3.5 million pages were included. Among the allegations are claims against Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, and Elon Musk. But initially, much of the material was deleted without explanation.
Epstein Files deleted then restored
Several social media users had already saved screenshots of the documents before the DOJ removed them. Later, the DOJ admitted the deletion was an “administrative error” and restored the files. The restored documents include tip-line information linking Epstein’s inner circle to alleged criminal activity in the late 1990s and early 2000s.
Previously, the documents were heavily redacted. The new release is more detailed. One tip alleges that Trump and Musk hosted parties at Mar-a-Lago called “calendar girls.” Epstein allegedly brought minors to these events, and the tip claims sexual acts and auctions took place. Accusers also claimed that Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, Melania Trump, and Alan Dershowitz attended, though they were not directly linked to the alleged abuse.
Specific allegations against Donald Trump raise concern
Some tips describe minors being forced into sexual acts with Trump. One alleged victim claimed she was abused at age 13. Another alleged a friend was struck for resisting. The files also allege that Clinton and Trump attended Epstein’s Florida parties frequently. Another tip describes orgies at Epstein’s New York City residence with minors and high-profile guests.
One of the most alarming allegations involves the Trump Golf Course in Rancho Palos Verdes, California, between 1995 and 1996. The tipster claims Ghislaine Maxwell facilitated sex trafficking at the location. She described girls going missing and threats of murder tied to the golf course.
Files remain unverified
Journalists like Brian Krassenstein have followed the case closely on social media. He reported that the DOJ mishandled the redactions and poorly managed the PDF files. While the tips remain unverified, their level of detail has raised concern among observers. Law enforcement has not deemed the claims credible or non-credible, leaving many questions unanswered.
The restored Epstein files continue to spark debate about powerful figures’ connections to the convicted sex offender. They highlight ongoing scrutiny and public interest in Epstein’s network and its alleged crimes.
