image credits- adweek
Advertisement
CNN anchor Dana Bash recently took a lighthearted jab at Vice President Kamala Harris, suggesting that viewers could “start a drinking game” based on the number of times Harris repeats the same talking points during her speeches and public appearances. The quip was made during a segment analyzing Harris’ communication style as she ramps up her campaign efforts for the 2024 presidential race.
Bash’s comment came as part of a broader discussion on Harris’ consistency in her messaging, particularly when it comes to key policy issues like the economy, reproductive rights, and voting access. While Harris has made it clear that these are central priorities for her campaign, some critics argue that her speeches have become overly repetitive, with little variation in how she presents her policy goals to voters.
“You hear the same phrases over and over again,” Bash noted. “At some point, you could start a drinking game based on how many times she says the same things.”
This remark has drawn attention to the fine line candidates must walk between staying on message and sounding monotonous. While sticking to a clear set of core issues is a common strategy for political campaigns, especially in the lead-up to a major election, it can sometimes lead to public fatigue if the messaging lacks variety or depth.
Harris’s campaign has focused heavily on a few central themes, such as protecting abortion rights, addressing climate change, and boosting the economy for middle-class Americans. These issues resonate with her base, but the repetitive nature of her public statements has become a point of discussion among political commentators. Some argue that the vice president needs to find new ways to communicate these messages to keep voters engaged.
Supporters of Harris, however, maintain that her consistency is a sign of discipline and clarity. They argue that in a chaotic and polarized political environment, sticking to key talking points ensures that her priorities remain at the forefront of the national conversation.
Still, the critique reflects a common challenge for candidates in long election campaigns: balancing the need for message discipline with the desire to keep speeches fresh and engaging. As Harris continues her campaign for the presidency, she may need to introduce new ideas or at least vary her delivery to avoid further criticism of being overly reliant on well-worn phrases.
Bash’s humorous take on Harris’ rhetorical style has also sparked conversations on social media, with some users joining in on the joke, while others defended the vice president’s approach.