Image credits - AZCentral
Advertisement
In a surprising political maneuver, the Arizona Police Association (APA) has endorsed Democratic Representative Ruben Gallego for the U.S. Senate, diverging from its previous support for Republican Kari Lake and former President Donald Trump. This endorsement is notable given the APA’s history and Gallego’s contentious record on law enforcement issues.
The APA’s decision to back Gallego, despite his progressive stances, comes as a shock to many observers. The association highlighted Gallego’s efforts to secure substantial funding for police departments, claiming that his support led to $168 billion in resources aimed at enhancing law enforcement capabilities. “Congressman Gallego has continually fought for robust, increased funding for America’s Law Enforcement, and specifically Arizona Law enforcement,” said APA President Justin Harris in a statement.
Gallego’s record on police issues has been a point of contention. He has previously advocated for restrictions on police access to military-grade weapons and has been vocal in his support for the Black Lives Matter movement. These positions, including his criticism of police use of certain weapons and efforts to limit their access to military gear, have drawn criticism from opponents. An Arizona Sun Times report has scrutinized his past statements and actions, highlighting a stark contrast with his current endorsement.
Despite the controversies, the APA’s endorsement reflects a strategic choice aimed at bridging partisan divides. Gallego’s campaign welcomed the support, emphasizing his commitment to public safety and law enforcement. “I am proud to have the APA’s support and look forward to working with them in the Senate,” Gallego said.
Kari Lake’s campaign, which has made public safety a central theme, condemned the APA’s endorsement. A spokesperson criticized Gallego’s record and argued that Lake is the stronger advocate for law enforcement. Nevertheless, the APA’s endorsement of Gallego underscores a significant shift in political alliances and highlights the complexities of contemporary electoral politics.