Advertisement
Mariah Carey is undeniably a powerhouse in the music industry, known for her incredible vocals, diva persona, and status as a Christmas icon. However, one of the most intriguing aspects of her personal life involves an unexpected legal maneuver: suing her ex-fiancée for what she deemed as wasting her time.
In 2016, Carey was engaged to Australian billionaire James Packer for a brief period. Their engagement, announced in January, swiftly came to an end by October following a highly publicized argument during a vacation in Greece. The abrupt termination of their relationship left Carey feeling emotionally distressed and financially impacted, especially since she had relocated from New York to Los Angeles to be with Packer.
In an unconventional move, Carey filed a lawsuit against Packer, seeking what she termed an “inconvenience fee” of $50 million. She argued that Packer’s actions had caused her significant emotional distress and financial loss, asserting that he had failed to fulfill promises that had ramifications for both her career and personal life.
However, the lawsuit did not progress to trial, as Carey and Packer reached an out-of-court settlement. While the exact amount remains undisclosed, Carey reportedly received a substantial sum, estimated to be between $5 million and $10 million. Additionally, she retained the extravagant 35-carat diamond engagement ring, valued at approximately $10 million.
The settlement was perceived as a triumph for Carey, not only in financial terms but also as a demonstration of her ability to assert her legal rights and secure a favorable resolution, even in matters of a personal nature. The case also shed light on the potential for individuals of high profile to seek compensation for the emotional and financial repercussions of broken engagements.
Despite this legal victory, Carey’s legal battles have extended beyond her personal life. She has faced disputes over her iconic holiday hit “All I Want for Christmas Is You,” with claims of plagiarism, as well as challenges when attempting to trademark the title “Queen of Christmas.” Nevertheless, her lawsuit against her ex-fiancée remains one of the most peculiar chapters in her legal history.