Delhi High Court issues notices to Police, UPSC on anticipatory bail plea of Ex-IAS officer

In a recent hearing, Justice Prasad of the Delhi High Court instructed the investigation agency not to proceed with Khedkar’s arrest while the matter is under judicial consideration.

The Delhi High Court has issued notices to the Delhi Police and the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) in response to an anticipatory bail plea filed by former Indian Administrative Service (IAS) officer Puja Khedkar. Khedkar is challenging a district court’s earlier decision, which denied her bail in connection with an FIR alleging that she falsified her identity to gain additional attempts in the highly competitive civil services examination.

The FIR, registered on a complaint by the UPSC, accuses Khedkar of impersonation, forgery, and other fraudulent practices. According to the prosecution, the former IAS officer allegedly misrepresented herself in official records to secure extra chances at clearing the civil services exam, a charge that carries significant legal consequences.

In a recent hearing, Justice Prasad of the Delhi High Court instructed the investigation agency not to proceed with Khedkar’s arrest while the matter is under judicial consideration. The court emphasized that an immediate arrest is not warranted, given the circumstances of the case, and any potential action should await the outcome of the hearing.

The court has scheduled a detailed hearing for August 21, during which both the Delhi Police and the UPSC are expected to present their arguments. The High Court’s decision to entertain Khedkar’s plea reflects the gravity of the allegations and the potential implications for the integrity of the civil services examination process.

Legal experts suggest that this case could set a significant precedent concerning the conduct of the civil services examination and the legal accountability of those who attempt to undermine its integrity. The developments in this case are being closely monitored, given the high-profile nature of the accused and the serious nature of the allegations.

The matter remains sub judice, with the next hearing likely to provide further clarity on the legal trajectory of this controversial case.